Home Scientific Creation Science Creation Hoaxes
Debate Self-Help Humor Contact

Science and Creation

Scientific Evidence for Creation


Science Verifies Creation.  Evidence for special creation surrounds us.  Everywhere from microscopic elements to the unfathomable recesses of the Universe.  This website is a collection of unbiased scientific evidence supporting creation. 

The Law of Biogenesis: Living things come only from living things (life arises from pre-existing life, not from nonliving material)


Do you believe that, "living things" can come from "nonliving things" by a series of coincidences?

What do you do when you become ill from bacteria, virus, fungus etc.?

  1. Do you believe that, the "genetic code" and the "body of the bacteria, virus or fungi" just formed by coincidence, in your "organic soup" or hamburger, and never look for the source of the infection (contaminated food or drink; ill people; unclean kitchenware or bathroom etc.)?

  2. Do you believe that, there is/was an infection source, and try to find out what or who was it, (food or drink, person or pet you kissed, bathroom etc.)?

Just a note:
If you believe that, there is/was an "infection source", (I hope that, you do), you believe that "Living things come only from living things", "life arises from pre-existing life, not from nonliving material".

Probability Of Life Forming By Coincidence
"A junkyard contains all the bits and pieces of a Boeing 747, dismembered and in disarray. A whirlwind happens to blow through the yard.  What is the chance that after its passage a fully assembled Boeing 747, ready to fly, will be found standing there?  So small as to be negligible, even if a tornado were to blow through enough junkyards to fill the whole Universe" (Prof. Dr. Sir Fred Hoyle, "The Intelligent Universe," Michael Joseph: London, 1983, pp.18-19.)

"The trouble is that there are about two thousand enzymes, and the chance of obtaining them all in a random trial is only one part in 1040,000, an outrageously small probability that could not be faced even if the whole universe consisted of organic soup.  If one is not prejudiced either by social beliefs or by a scientific training into the conviction that life originated on the Earth, this simple calculation wipes the idea entirely out of court." (Prof. Dr. Sir Fred Hoyle. & Prof. Dr. Chandra Wickramasinghe, N.C., "Evolution from Space," Paladin: London, 1981, Reprinted, 1983, pp.19-21).

Intelligent Design In Nature (A Mathematical Proof)

At the time of Charles Darwin's Evolution of the Species, basically all scientists assumed that the smallest living things were structurally very simple ...and that single cells were just filled with a simple jelly-like substance.  But biologists now know they were wrong.  Actually, the total DNA and mechanistic intricacy of a mere E-coli bacterium (and what fundamentally makes it "alive") is even beyond current scientific comprehension. www.testingworldviews.com/mathproofcreat.html

The Genesis Conflict

The Earth in Time and Space, the big bang theory of origins and its plausibility...  Evidence for rapid water deposition of the layers of the geological column, canyon formation, erosional features, and paraconformites (missing time zones)...

If the video does not start automatically click on the link: http://amazingdiscoveries.tv/c/10/The_Genesis_Conflict_-_English/

Did Darwin Murder God

The theory of evolution is based on faith. No scientist can explain how life comes about; everything about the origin of life on earth is a mystery, and it seems the more that is known, the more complex the puzzle gets. Darwin admitted that his theory would absolutely be broken down if it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed which could not possibly have been formed through numerous, successful, slight, modifications. So why do the masses still cling to Darwin’s idea? Creation and the universe is evidence enough that there is a Living God.

If the video does not start automatically click on the link: http://amazingdiscoveries.tv/c/180/Did_Darwin_Murder_God/

Technology during Darwin's time Technology in the present time

The picture of an "E. coli" bacteria under 1,000x magnification


Charles Darwin's Microscope: Max. magnification 1,300x (the quality of the image was poor at 1,300 magnification). Darwin used usually 850x magnification.

Darwin saw a primitive, rounded glob of matter called "protoplasm". He thought it consisted of a few elementary components that could be easily assembled.

Electron Microscope: Max. magnification: 10,000,000

"Bacterial Flagellar Motor" (composite of electron micrograph).  Click on the link for full explanation: www.creationwiki.org/Flagellum

Today we use electron microscope, and we know bacteria contain complex molecular machines, each bacterium being more like a sophisticated automobile factory with multiple robotic devices and a complex control center.

Life's Important Questions
DNA Double Helix Video - Does it point to an act of random evolution or intelligent design? www.allaboutscience.org/dna-double-helix-video.htm Video Charles Darwin (video) and his infamous theory of evolution.  Discover the truth today! www.allaboutscience.org/charles-darwin-video.htm Video
Creation Evolution Video - Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria; Evidence for Evolution in the Creation versus Evolution Debate?  This great clip that covers one of the main arguments for Darwinian Evolution. www.allaboutcreation.org/creation-evolution-video.htm Video

Does God Exist? The Big Questions - Prerequisite to answer the other big questions of life.  Was there a Creator?


The Improbability of Abiogenesis - The smallest life form would have needed about 256 genes.  The probability of getting one DNA molecule right about one in 10 to the 89,900 power (89,900 zero after the number 1), still essentially zero. This number get even bigger, when we are considering what proteins the DNA generates, or how the rest of the cell structure would get put together! So the real probability would be fantastically small.


The Top 30 Problems with the Big Bang - Science has so much quality evidence accumulated against a model "Big Bang Theory". Even the most basic elements of the theory, the expansion of the universe and the fireball remnant radiation, remain interpretations with credible alternative explanations.  www.metaresearch.org/cosmology/BB-top-30.asp#_edn4

The Improbability of Abiogenesis




First Law of Thermodynamics (Law of Conservation of Matter): matter and energy cannot be created or destroyed, but can be transferred from one form to another.
Second Law of Thermodynamics (Law of Increasing Entropy), usable energy in the universe available for work is decaying or running down to a state of inert uniformity, or heat death.
Science: A field of study, using observations and experiments, to better understand natural phenomena
Pure or Fundamental Science: A science that is conducted without any errors, prejudices, opinions or predetermined notions.  Pure science describes and/or calculates absolute laws governing objects, forces, and reactions.  Pure or fundamental science works with the most basic forces and objects, and the relationships and laws that govern them.
Pure Sciences: mathematics, physics, and chemistry
Scientific evidence: Verifiable measurements or observations that support or oppose possible physical explanations


Micro Evolution: It involves changes only in size, shape, or color, or minor genetic alterations caused by a few mutations.

Macro Evolution: require thousands of beneficial change, that produces increased improvement.   The offspring would have a different and improved set of vital organs. 

Proteins are so hard to make that in all of nature, they never form except in already living cells.

This website is still under "creation", please check back later for updates

Science and Creation

Scientific Evidence for Creation

Copyright © 2013-2014 www.science-creation.com  All rights reserved.