Home Scientific Creation Science Creation Hoaxes
Debate Self-Help Humor Contact

Science and Creation

Scientific Evidence for Creation


Science Verifies Creation.  Evidence for special creation surrounds us.  Everywhere from microscopic elements to the unfathomable recesses of the Universe.  This website is a collection of unbiased scientific evidence supporting creation. 
Scientific evidence: Verifiable measurements or observations that support or oppose possible physical explanations
The Law of Biogenesis: Living things come only from living things (life arises from pre-existing life, not from nonliving material)


Do you believe that, "living things" can come from "nonliving things" by a series of coincidences?

What do you do when you become ill from bacteria, virus, fungus etc.?

  1. Do you believe that, the "genetic code" and the "body of the bacteria, virus or fungi" just formed by coincidence, in your "organic soup" or hamburger, and never look for the source of the infection (contaminated food or drink; ill people; unclean kitchenware or bathroom etc.)?

  2. Do you believe that, there is/was an infection source, and try to find out what or who was it, (food or drink, person or pet you kissed, bathroom etc.)?

Just a note:
If you believe that, there is/was an "infection source", (I hope that, you do), you believe that "Living things come only from living things", "life arises from pre-existing life, not from nonliving material".

Question: What is wrong with the Darwinian evolution?  Why is it not scientific at all?

Answer: Darwin built his theory on an "uncertain picture" he saw "only a few simple elements in the living cells", and Darwin made a wrong conclusion: "the living cells can be assembled easily".

Conclusion: If the foundation of evolution is false and unscientific, it is obvious the entire "theory of evolution" is unscientific.

Technology during Darwin's time Technology in the present time

Charles Darwin's Microscope: Max. magnification 1,300x (the quality of the image was poor at 1,300 magnification). Darwin used usually 850x magnification

Darwin saw a primitive, rounded glob of matter (similar as this picture) called "protoplasm". He thought it consisted of a few elementary components that could be easily assembled.

Electron Microscope: Max. magnification: 10,000,000

"Bacterial Flagellar Motor" (composite of electron micrograph).  Click on the link for full explanation: www.creationwiki.org/Flagellum

Today we use electron microscopes, and we know that, bacteria contain complex molecular machines, each bacterium being more like a sophisticated automobile factory with multiple robotic devices and a complex control center.

DNA Double Helix Video - Does it point to an act of random evolution or intelligent design? www.allaboutscience.org/dna-double-helix-video.htm Video

Charles Darwin (video) and his infamous theory of evolution.  Discover the truth today! http://www.allaboutscience.org/darwin-theory-of-evolution-video.htm  Video
Evolution Video - Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria; Evidence for Evolution in the Creation versus Evolution Debate?  This great clip that covers one of the main arguments for Darwinian Evolution.  Video  www.allaboutcreation.org/creation-evolution-video.htm

The Improbability of Abiogenesis


The Improbability of Abiogenesis - The smallest life form would have needed about 256 genes.  The probability of getting one DNA molecule right about one in 10 to the 89,900 power (89,900 zero after the number 1), still essentially zero. This number get even bigger, when we are considering what proteins the DNA generates, or how the rest of the cell structure would get put together! So the real probability would be fantastically small.


The Top 30 Problems with the Big Bang - Science has so much quality evidence accumulated against a model "Big Bang Theory". Even the most basic elements of the theory, the expansion of the universe and the fireball remnant radiation, remain interpretations with credible alternative explanations.  www.metaresearch.org/cosmology/BB-top-30.asp#_edn4

Intelligent Design In Nature (A Mathematical Proof)

At the time of Charles Darwin's Evolution of the Species, basically all scientists assumed that the smallest living things were structurally very simple ...and that single cells were just filled with a simple jelly-like substance.  But biologists now know they were wrong.  Actually, the total DNA and mechanistic intricacy of a mere E-coli bacterium (and what fundamentally makes it "alive") is even beyond current scientific comprehension. www.testingworldviews.com/mathproofcreat.html

The Intelligent Design of the Cosmos  (A Mathematical Proof)  -   www.testingworldviews.com/mathprfcosmos.html

This website is still under "creation", please check back later for updates

Science and Creation

Scientific Evidence for Creation

Copyright 2013-2014 www.science-creation.com  All rights reserved.